The Difference That Counts
![]()
Submitted
by Tara Ganse
Quartz Hill High School
Quartz
Hill, California
Current
Teaching Assignment:
9th Grade Integrated Physical Science
Past
Teaching Assignments: 9-12 Grade
English
In
a perfect world, all parents would teach and model appropriate choices and
behavior to their children. In that perfect world, other adult role models such
as teachers, religious and civic leaders, and sports stars would have a fairly
small role in the moral development of our nation’s youth. But this is not a
perfect world and too often these days, parents neglect their most basic and
primary duty: to teach their child to be a “good” person.
When the phone rang, I answered it. If I had known what the ensuing
conversation would be like, I might not have picked it up.
“Ms. Ganse? I’d like to talk with you about the after school
detention that you assigned my son,” came the voice; it was full of anger and
contempt.
In the next thirty minutes, I became fully aware of just how desperate
the situation is in the homes of many of my students. This mother was irate that
I would hold her son accountable for being disruptive and require him to stay
after school because it inconvenienced her to have to pick him up since he would
not be able to take the bus. When I told her about the rude and disruptive
outbursts that repeated warnings had not stemmed and that I demand respect in my
classroom, she replied, “You can’t expect students to behave that way!
That’s asking too much.”
I wish I could say that this parent’s behavior and views are unusual,
but they’re not. I dread having to call students’ parents these days. I seem
to recall a time when students feared “the call home” because they knew they
were going to hear about it from their parents. Now I call home and hear the
same sort of excuses that I hear from my students. I guess I understand where
the poor behavior and shady morals come from, and it saddens me. My students are
good kids. They just need someone to stand up and fill that necessary role.
So who is to take up the slack? For children whose parents are not good
role models, the next best substitute may be an adult family friend or the
pastor in their church, but the most common adult children see besides their
parent is their teacher. This indisputable fact leads to some heavy
responsibility being laid on teachers these days. While I may be able to sit
back and consider what society as a whole should do to mitigate the problem, I
choose to consider what I personally – as a teacher – may do because it is
something that I have control over.
While I believe that when every child is born, certain traits and
characteristics are hard-wired, I think that even more importantly is the
environment in which children are brought up. Poor home lives can negatively
impact children in profound ways and can overwhelm the natural inclination most
children have to want to please and not hurt those around them. This innate
conscience leads children to want to improve themselves and look toward the best
role model they can. I think that a good role model can overcome a poor one, and
I am immensely grateful that this is the case. I think that by exhibiting the
most compassionate, responsible, and understanding behavior possible to my
students, I make a difference. By being a good role model – that is by
demonstrating consideration of myself and others and how my behavior and choices
impact others – I make a difference.
Many
students are unaware of the harsh realities of the world outside their home.
Parents of today try to shelter their children too much. They shelter them from
the emotional discomfort of doing something wrong and feeling badly about it.
They shelter them from feeling like their decisions may have hurt other
people. I suppose many decline to discipline their kids and hold them
accountable thinking that they are protecting them; they are not. The parents
who have left their children to their own devices to develop their own ethics
and sense of responsibility are bound to have trouble and be at a disadvantage.
Besides having good role models, children need to be taught limits and
responsibility by someone. If parents refuse to take on this
responsibility, someone is obligated to do so. Teachers must teach students the
limits of their classroom and when they are crossed, the teacher has a moral
responsibility to follow through with the appropriate consequence. Learning to
identify and accept the negative consequences of one’s poor choices is the
most basic step in developing moral compunction.
In
the spring of 2001, I read a revealing article in American Educator
entitled, “Parenting: The Lost Art.” This article clearly illustrates one of
the most pressing problems we teachers see today when dealing with the parents
of our students. Many parents are so concerned about being their children’s
friends that they forget how to be their effective parents. This article calls
them “peer-parents.” The belief many parents hold that they are simply there
as a “guide” to their children is well illustrated by a mother referring to
her young teenage son. She claimed that, “They [the kids] have to make
decisions, whether to take drugs, to have sex… I can give them my opinion,
tell them how I feel. But they have to decide for themselves.” While this may
be true to a certain extent as a child approaches full adulthood, too often
parents abdicate their decision making job way too early. Most children are not
capable of making informed, mature decisions on their own until they are out of
high school. They are very capable of forming the principles guiding
appropriate, moral behavior, but they are inexperienced in the application of
these principles and need an adult to help them work through this difficult
time.
Piaget
developed a theory of the cognitive development of children. He theorized that
during adolescence children typically move from concrete to formal operative
thinking. During the concrete operational stage, children have trouble forming
abstract ideas and considering situations with more than two variables. As
children move into formal operative thinking, they develop the ability to think
reflectively and can better consider how their behavior is affecting themselves
and others. However, Piaget also completed research that suggested a child’s
social environment affects the age at which this transfer occurs. I believe that
today’s children, by watching too much television and not having enough
interaction with morally responsible adults, are not making the transition as
early in life. The longer children remain in the concrete operative stage, the
more chance they have of being in a situation where they will make a poor
decision because they are at a disadvantage cognitively. While I may not be able
to affect what goes on in the home, I can help students progress toward the
transition by stimulating their minds with complex questions and interactions,
by making class an exciting and rewarding place to be, and by fostering interest
in intellectual pursuits such as academics, hobbies and the like. The more
stimulating my class is, the more my students grow and develop.
And
lastly, for those children who have never or rarely seen a positive role model
who also appears “real” or “normal”, I think they eventually come to the
conclusion that you cannot have good moral standards unless you are a
“goody-two-shoes.” There seems to be a misconception by many students that
to be “good” means to be boring and not going anywhere in life, thus it is
unappealing to them as something for which to strive. We need to change that
perception by allowing our students to know us as people and as active members
of society. Too often students view their teachers as unreal entities that do
not struggle with the same moral dilemmas that they do. Good role models cannot
preach about good morals. Living a moral life is much easier said than done.
Teaching morals only by talking about them would be like trying to teach
students how to balance chemical equations by never demonstrating the process on
the board. A few kids may just “get it” but they would be in the minority.
Teachers have to demonstrate morality by example to have the lesson be
effective.
Ideally,
parents would completely fulfill the role that is called parenthood. Some do
fantastically, and I wish I could personally thank each and every one of them.
Many do not, and I wish that I could instruct each and every one of them
personally. Perhaps parents of today are merely ignorant; perhaps they are
calling out for help. I am not in a position to be able to educate enough
parents to make a significant difference, but I am in a position to reach their
children. I can teach students responsibility and consideration of self and
others, provide a stimulating environment, and share myself as a person who
struggles with the same choices and dilemmas while being a positive role model.
I take my role as an educator and all that it entails very seriously and I think
I can make a difference.
Questions
Regarding the Required Reading
1.
Comment on the 6-year old with a telescope and his interest in abstract ideas.
How unusual was he? Have you encountered students with similar focus and
reasoning abilities? Discuss.
I
don’t believe the abstract ideas and interests that the 6-year old with a
telescope exhibited are unusual. Children have a natural innate curiosity about
the world around them and tend to develop exquisite philosophies to explain it.
The problem is that too many adults stifle this curiosity and creativity; the
result is students that simply wait for adults to tell them what they should
know and believe. I occasionally come across students that still have this
natural desire to find explanations, but they unfortunately are few and far
between by the time they reach high school.
2.
Were you surprised to read that young children may be “ethically introspective
citizens”? Discuss.
I
was not surprised at all! In my experience most children are “ethically
introspective.” While young children may not be experienced enough to always
make “ethically” appropriate choices, they are experienced enough to
consider the moral implications of their own and others choices and behaviors.
3.
Do you agree that morality can be taught in all kinds of classes. Give examples
from experience.
Morality
is a quality that can be taught through example at any time in any situation. I
do not necessarily feel that instructional time should be set aside to
“teach” students about morality (and besides, I’m not sure it can
effectively be taught in any way but by example), but a teacher should seize any
opportunity in the classroom that presents itself to demonstrate and/or discuss
appropriate morality with his or her students. One instance where this topic
typically comes up in my class is over the concept of cheating. I believe that
students consider their behavior in this regard more completely when a teacher
engages the class in a discussion of why copying homework or sharing answers on
a test are inappropriate versus just telling them that they will get in trouble
if they are caught.
4.
What was meant by the phrase encountered in your required reading: “We are all
moral witnesses”? Describe an instance in the classroom when you were a moral
witness.
Being
a moral witness means actively participating in the continually evolving and
changing moral code of society. When people engage in meaningful introspection
and/or discussion about whether a behavior is moral or not, they are acting as
witnesses in the court of societal change. As a teacher, I consider myself a
facilitator in encouraging all of m students to be moral witnesses. When I
taught English I would do this by calling their attention to moral dilemmas that
are not clear cut in literature and ask them to take a stand and justify their
position. In my science class, environmental issues are typically good starting
grounds for asking students to consider the complex issues of moral versus
immoral activities.
5.
Define courage. Tell of a youngster who has had the courage to stand up for
his/her beliefs/values.
Courage
is a trait that is demonstrated by individuals when they make a conscious
decision to maintain their values or actions under danger of criticism,
ostracism, or actual physical harm. Courage can be strikingly demonstrated by
teens who happen to be in a time of their life when social acceptance is so
important. In my first year of teaching I had a girl in my class who was
severely developmentally disabled. For the first few days, the class practically
ignored the girl and I was concerned that some of those discrete whispers in the
back of the classroom were snide remarks about her. I was fairly inexperienced
with this sort of situation and knew that any comments that I made, as an
authority figure, would have little bearing on what was said when I could not
overhear. Needless to say, I was pleasantly surprised when a couple of days
later one of the more outgoing and “popular” girls in my class walked up to
the disabled girl and introduced herself and began talking with her. For the
first couple days, this girl who went out of her way was the butt of no few
jokes by her peers, but as time went by without her changing her attitude, I
started to see the rest of the class considering their behavior more closely and
eventually following her lead. It was great to see her determination to ignore
the jibes and jeers of her peers while continuing to do what she thought was
right.
6.
Comment on the discussion on courage that took place during a 4th
grade history, as outlined in the required reading. Share an experience where
your class spontaneously engaged in a moral analysis.
In
the reading, the author expresses “incredulity” that “an elementary school
child shows a capacity for probing moral analysis that encompasses the very
nature of a belief… in this case, the value is courage.” I think, in
general, that children are actually more capable of discussing what courage is
because, in most cases, they still have not been tainted by the pessimism and
cynicism of the realities of the adult world. At their age, they are still
idealistic and can consider courage – or other values – is their purest
forms. I teach in a fairly suburban school but come from rural roots. On one
particular occasion, my students got onto the topic of slaughtering animals for
meat and whether this is a morally justifiable act. My students were fairly
polarized regarding the topic, but in this case and others I find it encouraging
that when students are provided with the time and consideration, they can quite
capably justify their beliefs and values as they did in the forth grade class
discussion regarding the courage of pilgrims.
7.
How is a good person described at the end of the required reading involving A
Bronx Tale?
A
Bronx Tale
defines a good person as one who not only observes and considers others morality
but is attentive to their own thoughts and actions and how these may affect
their future and the futures of those around them.
8.
What should a teacher do when she/he sees a student trying to get another
student in trouble or somehow disrupting the class?
During
the moment that the disruption occurs in class, the teacher must maintain order
in the same method that he or she normally would. This maintenance should
involve an unemotional, pre-determined set of consequences that the teacher has
already set forth. Teachers need to be prepared to react to student disruptions
in a way that does not apply anger or hostility, just a calm, sure assertion of
the teacher’s mature control of the classroom environment. In the case where a
student is trying to get another into trouble, however, I believe the teacher
should also ask the offending student to remain after class to discuss how their
behavior negatively affects themselves and others. Additionally, the teacher
needs to discuss with this student what the consequences of similar future
behavior will be and then stick to it.
9.
The Harry Singer Foundation pilot projects, Dream Machine, White Hats,
and Problem Solvers are based on the premise that students have the
capacity to act responsibly, interact with adults in the community, and make
mature decisions. In light of the article by Shannon Brownlee regarding the
development of the teen brain, do you think the Foundation may be giving teens
too much credit?
No,
I do not believe the Foundation is giving teens too much credit. When teens are
held to high expectations, they tend to live up to them whether they are
academic or moral responsibilities. Teens may not be capable of making the best
decisions in all circumstances, but with the proper guidance they are definitely
capable of doing the best that they can to be moral and responsible members of
the community. Some students may struggle with making mature decisions because
of their lack of experience, and this is when appropriate role models become
crucial and can make all the difference in helping a child develop into a
responsible and moral member of a community.
10.
If you think your students are capable, will you engage a group in one of our
pilot projects? If not, why not?
Whether
I would be interested in engaging a group of my students in one of the Singer
Foundation’s pilot projects depends on further information I would receive
about the projects. The information that I have read so far was a fairly basic
overview. At this point in my career, I do not feel that I would be capable of
participating in a project that was time or labor intensive, but I would be
interested in receiving more information before making a decision.
BACK