1989-1990 Harry Singer Foundation National Essay Contest
Should Terms of Those Serving In The House of
Representatives Be Limited? Why, How or Why Not?
Teacher:
Clifton Central High School, Clifton, Illinois
1st Andrew J. Cailteux 2nd Brad Weedon 3rd Scott Shell
"A mandatory retirement age of 70 should be adopted. This would allow
for a person to have a late appearance on the national scene and still be able to serve a
large number of years. A mandatory retirement at age 70 would not allow Representatives to
serve terms up to the point at which they can no longer function properly. A
Representative should be allowed to finish the term that he is serving when the mandatory
retirement age is reached."
Unidentified Student, Clifton Central High School, Clifton, Illinois
"When a truly controversial topic arises, such as abortion or capital
punishment, you can bet groups on both sides of the issue will also be born. These groups
take an active part in swaying borderline politicians' decisions. This, along with voting,
is how the general public can take part in the government. When I hear common people
passionately arguing over politics, I am filled with pride and realize that democracy will
not die as long as the people believe in it and take interest."
Unidentified Student, Clifton Central High School, Clifton, Illinois
"If the House terms were limited, the position would come to be
recognized as a mere "stepping stone" to a lucrative job in the private sector.
A representative could become elected, serve his terms, leave the office and use his
insider's knowledge of the political process to wield disproportionate influence on the
government's decision making. Obviously, the "revolving door" problem would only
be augmented."
Unidentified Student, Clifton Central High School, Clifton, Illinois