Kadoka High School
Kadoka, South Dakota
Teacher:  Teresa Shuck

 

bd05015_.wmf (9294 bytes)

The Election Process
By Kim Leach
Grade 11

 

Throughout the past there has been many disagreements about the elector votes.  Many people disagree how the voting was done.  Some think in was unorganized while others thought it was fine.  Voting should stay the same.

 

Electoral College votes have been around for many years now.  It is a simple process for each state to do.  It is the best way to vote.  I think it should stay as the Electoral College votes.

Electoral College votes are the best for each state.  I think we should change the fact so that each state has the same amount of electoral votes.  I do not think it is fair for one state to have one while another has fifty-six.  That is not fair to the smaller state.  It is just saying the smaller states vote doesn’t count compared to the larger states.

 

The Electoral College votes and also don’t use the peoples input on the election.  It has the state vote so the people who vote do not have any input on the election.  I think we should try to change this so we, the people, can have our voices heard by not only our states but by our country.

 

“The electoral college method of electing a president of the United States is archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect and dangerous,” according to William Gossett, the American Bar Association president in 1968.  He pointed out that in fifteen elections, a shift of less than one percent are distributed among states according to the decennial census, which quickly becomes outdated.  Still others say the Electoral College endangers the two-party system and encourages third party strategy to win concessions from major candidates.

 

The American Institute of Public Opinion asked before and after the 1968 election,  “Would you approve or disapprove of an amendment to the Constitution, which would do away with the Electoral College and base the election of a president on the total vote cast throughout the nation?”

 

An amendment to abolish the Electoral College system, almost identical to the Bayh Plan, passed the House 339 to 70 and it looked as if the 91st Congress was going to resolve this on-going issue.  However, the Senate failed to follow through and the furor over electoral reform continued into 1970.  Opponents could not accept the unfavorable impact and the direct-vote plan would have on the two-party system.  They thought the direct vote would encourage minority parties because there would be a greater probability that two major parties would not receive a majority.  They maintained the Bayh Plan would make actual voting more important than population and would give less voice to the poor non-voters represented by the weighted urban vote.  A candidate, if elected on popular vote alone, could conceivable win on the votes of special interests; for example, on labor vote, business vote, pro-life vote or, as Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew did in 1968, on the law and order vote.

         

Over the years many people believe that education makes political and voting easier to understand and is the single most important variable in increasing citizen participation in the election process.  This is very true in the ballots.  People need to know how to read properly to understand what the ballots say and how to fill them out.  That is considered to be the most important in filling out the ballot.

 

Voting is a complicated thing that most people do not understand.  If you have to most educational things then you should probably have an education before you can vote.  Education comes in very important in this case.  The archaic, and undemocratic is something most people do not understand.  To vote it would be wise to know what these words mean, and how to read would be helpful.

 

A question to consider is should the popular vote be aggregated.  This needs to be considered by the entire country.  Existing Electoral College and automatic plans say by states themselves.  The district plan says by state subdivision.  The Proportional plan says by party vote by states and the direct-vote plan said by the entire nation.

 

The emphasis on local constituencies, on bringing government home to people and giving greater sense of worth to individual citizens is either a plus or a minus depending on your political philosophy.  The biggest problem lies with the increased incentive to gerrymandering.  District lines would become more important than ever, opening areas of potential contention.  In 1970, Sayre and Parrish feared the district plan would reverse the system which has always ensured that the winner in our presidential contests has received a greater margin in electoral than in popular votes, and that it would make presidential races closer, possible throwing more decisions to Congress and this undermining the presidency.  They warned that a vote for the district plan would be a vote against the balance of power, which makes our system of government unique.

 

The Electoral College is the way we should keep on voting.  There are ways it could improve the popular vote.  The voting has changed over the years but mainly the same procedure is used.  A person has to have a good education to know how to vote.  You should also be able to read and fill out the ballot correctly.  I have told you about the Electoral College and the education you need.


1.       How and when did the United States elect a president and vice president of different parties?  Name them and their respective parties.

 

In 1796 John Adams, a Federalist, was elected as President.  His vice president, Thomas Jefferson was a Republican.  This happened because the ballots did not clarify which was president and which was vice president.

 

2.       Describe four ways that were suggested to elect the President between 1808 and 1846.

 

Lot first surfaced the fist way.  The second is first-direct vote plan.  The third plan was by being chosen by four regions on a rotating basis.  The last way used was by proposal was by Electoral College votes.

 

3.       Name five U.S. Presidents who were elected with less than a popular vote.

 

          John Quincy Adams             1824

          J. Polk                    1844

          Z. Taylor                          1848

          J. Buchanan                      1856

          Abraham Lincoln                1860

 

4.       Describe the winner-take-all system.  Which states use this system?

 

Winner take all system is when ethnic minorities win while the small rural areas does not really have a choice.  All states use this procedure except Maine.  The proportional plan is when there is close to have the majority wins.  They do the counting by proportions.

 

5.       When do electors vote and when are the results know?

 

The first Monday after the second Wednesday in December is when they vote.  In January the votes are counted before both Houses.

 

6.       What affects would substituting direct popular vote for the Electoral College have on third party candidates?  Why?

It would make it more at edge on who gets the office.  It would do that because correct about federal system but wrong in saying that the plan would assure victory.

 

7.       Give four arguments for and against a direct vote system.

         

The first one would be District lines would become more important.  The second argument would be it should not be enough to carry the popular vote.  The third is it would leave some states without choice.  The last would be distortions, which occur because electoral votes are distributed among the states according to decennial census.

 

The proportional plan is when there is close to have the majority wins.  They do the counting by proportions.  The winner-take-all sys

 

8.       Describe the differences between the district plan, the proportional plan and the winner-take all plan.

         

The district plan is designed forever district to vote and then send the votes into the state.  The proportional plan is when there is close to have the majority wins.  They do the counting by proportions.  The winner-take-all system gives too much leverage to popular votes in low turn out states.  It gives most of the leverage to larger states.

 

9.       State the four points experts in 1969 agreed should be included in an ideal plan for electing U.S. President.

In 1969 advocates claimed that with such system it would give equal weight to every vote and do away with the faithless elector problem.

 

10.     Write a paragraph describing what is meant by one of the following: The people most likely to be under represented.

The people most likely to be under represented would be the people who aren't that popular or are unknown.  These people usually do not have the self-confidence to go out and do something on their own.  Self-confidence is needed to be represented in something.

 
[Back] [Home] [Main Menu] [Another Way] [Essay Contest]  [Pilot Projects] [Archives]